The Rumored ‘Ultra’ AirPods Pro: My Wallet Is Already Crying

I was just sitting here, minding my own business, trying to get some work done on a gloomy Monday morning. Then the notification hit. You know the one. The kind that makes you look at your bank account and sigh before you’ve even read the headline.

Apparently, Apple isn’t done with our ears yet. The rumor mill is spinning up again, and this time it’s about a new, higher-end tier of AirPods Pro launching later this year. Not a replacement for the current ones, mind you. A new tier. A “Pro-er” Pro.

And the price? Let’s just say if the leaks are accurate, we’re looking at a number that makes the current $249 tag look like a bargain bin special.

The $399 Earbud Question

Okay, let’s address the elephant in the room immediately. The chatter suggests a price point hovering around $399. For in-ear headphones. I remember when I thought spending $150 on headphones was bougie. Now we’re approaching the cost of an iPad for something I could accidentally drop down a storm drain.

I’ve been an audio guy for years. I have the wired IEMs, the DACs, the whole messy desk setup. I get why audio can be expensive. But wireless buds have always been disposable tech. Batteries die. Bluetooth standards change. You lose one on the subway. Dropping nearly four hundred bucks on something with a shelf life of three years feels… aggressive.

But here’s the thing that annoys me: I’m probably going to buy them. And Apple knows it.

What Could Possibly Justify the ‘Ultra’ Label?

If they are actually going to ask for that much cash, they can’t just slap a “Titanium” label on the case and call it a day. (Please don’t be just a titanium case). There has to be some serious silicon magic happening inside.

My best guess? We’re finally looking at the xMEMS solid-state driver transition. If you haven’t been following the nerdy side of audio tech lately, solid-state drivers are the cool new kid on the block. They’re smaller, more precise, and respond way faster than the traditional coil-and-magnet speakers we’ve been shoving in our ears for decades.

Apple AirPods Pro - Apple AirPods Pro (2nd generation) with MagSafe Case (USB-C ...
Apple AirPods Pro – Apple AirPods Pro (2nd generation) with MagSafe Case (USB-C …

Creative and a few others started dabbling with this last year, but if Apple goes all-in on a hybrid driver system—using a dynamic driver for bass and a solid-state unit for the highs—that could actually fix the muddy treble that sometimes plagues the current Pros.

Also, bandwidth. We’ve been stuck on Bluetooth limitations forever. If this new “high-end” model finally uses a proprietary ultra-wideband connection to the iPhone to stream actual, honest-to-god lossless audio? Okay. You have my attention. I’m tired of seeing the “Lossless” badge in Apple Music while listening through a straw.

The Health Angle: A Thermometer in Your Ear?

I’ve been hearing whispers about health sensors in AirPods for what feels like five years now. Every year, the analysts say “this is the one,” and every year, we just get slightly better noise cancellation.

But at this price tier, they need a killer feature that isn’t just “sounds good.” Putting heart rate and body temp sensors in the ear canal makes sense. It’s actually a more accurate place to measure core temp than your wrist. If they market this as a serious health device alongside the Watch, that $399 sting might fade for the fitness crowd.

I tried running with a chest strap monitor last week. It chafed. It was awful. If my earbuds could do that job without the torture device wrapped around my ribs, I might stop complaining about the price. Might.

The Case for Segmentation

Here’s my worry, though. By introducing a “Super Pro” tier, does the regular Pro tier get neglected?

We saw this with the iPad. Once the “Pro” and “Air” lines got blurry, it became a headache to recommend anything. “Get this one if you draw, but this one if you only draw sometimes, but that one if you hate money.”

Right now, the AirPods lineup is simple.

  • Regular: For people who just want to hear stuff.
  • Pro: For people who want silence.
  • Max: For people who want to wear a status symbol (and have strong necks).

person wearing earbuds - Portrait of the young middle eastern man wearing wireless earbuds ...
person wearing earbuds – Portrait of the young middle eastern man wearing wireless earbuds …

Squeezing a fourth category in there—high-end in-ears—muddies the water. It feels like they’re solving a profit margin problem, not a user problem.

My Current Frustrations

I love my current Pros, but they aren’t perfect. The transparency mode, while still the best in the industry, has started to sound a bit robotic compared to my own natural hearing. And the battery life? It’s fine for a commute, but on a flight to London, I’m still doing the “charge one bud at a time” dance halfway over the Atlantic.

If this new model gives me 8-10 hours of playback with ANC on, I’ll shut up and hand over my credit card. That’s the real “Pro” feature I want. Not gold plating. Not a screen on the case (seriously, who asked for that?). Just give me battery life that outlasts my own social battery.

The Ecosystem Lock-in is Real

Look, I could go buy the high-end Sony buds or the new Sennheisers. They sound incredible. I’ve tried them. But then I try to switch from my phone to my laptop, and it’s a five-step process involving settings menus and cursing.

person wearing earbuds - What's that? How earbuds can wreck your hearing (especially for ...
person wearing earbuds – What’s that? How earbuds can wreck your hearing (especially for …

With the AirPods, I just… stop playing on one and start on the other. Usually. When it works, it’s magic. When it doesn’t, I want to throw them out the window. But it works often enough that I’m trapped.

This new high-end model is going to lean heavily into that ecosystem integration. Probably some specific features for Vision Pro users, too. Low latency is critical for spatial computing, and I bet they lock the lowest latency tier behind these new expensive buds.

So, Are We Buying This?

It’s January. The product isn’t even out yet. We’re just reacting to supply chain gossip and code snippets. But knowing Apple, this product will launch in the fall, everyone will mock the price on social media for three days, and then they’ll be sold out until February 2027.

I want to be the guy who stands on principle and says, “No, $400 is too much for disposable audio.” I really do. But if they fix the battery life and give me true lossless audio? I’m going to be part of the problem.

I’ll keep an eye on the leaks as we get closer to WWDC. Maybe I’ll start a “New AirPods” savings jar now. If I put away a dollar every time Siri misunderstands me, I should have enough cash by next Tuesday.